AUDIT

⭐ Accessibility & Modernization Audit

A structural, semantic, and performance focused audit that reveals the truth of your system.

---

⭐ AURALICODE® LLC—ACCESSIBILITY & MODERNIZATION AUDIT

Target Organization:

URL:

Date:

Auditor: Galen W. Tenney, Founding SSA Architect, Founder of Auralicode® LLC

---

Document Ref: AUC 2026 [ORG CODE]

Prepared by: Auralicode® LLC | Accessibility & Modernization Architecture / Sovereign SEO Architecture (SSA)

Principal Architect: Galen W. Tenney, Founding SSA Architect, Founder of Auralicode® LLC

Audience: Executive Leadership, Communications, Accessibility, and Technical Stakeholders — [Organization Name]

---

⭐ What We Analyze

  • Accessibility
  • Performance (INP, LCP, CLS)
  • Semantic structure
  • Metadata stability
  • Angular/Next.js/Nuxt SEO behavior
  • Component integrity
  • Navigation clarity
---

⭐ Deliverables

  • Full audit report
  • Accessibility findings
  • Modernization recommendations
  • Structural map
  • Prioritized fixes
  • Modernization path options
---

⭐ Why Modernization Matters

Legacy systems create friction: brittle templates, inaccessible components, unpredictable behavior, and performance regressions.

These aren’t just technical issues — they’re human issues.

---

⭐ Our Modernization Approach

  • Predictable interaction patterns
  • Semantic rebuilds
  • Architecture that lasts
---

⭐ Sovereign SEO Architecture (SSA)

A constitutional grade web governance system for rebuilding public facing Angular/Next.js/Nuxt apps in the post JavaScript illusion era.

---

⭐ Modernization Outcomes

  • Accessible systems
  • Predictable behavior
  • Stable metadata
  • Indexable content
  • Reduced cognitive load
  • Long-term maintainability
---

⭐ What Accessibility Means Here

  • Reduced cognitive load
  • Predictable interaction
  • Clear navigation
  • Semantic structure
  • Assistive tech compatibility
  • Performance that feels fast
---

⭐ The Audit

1. MOBILE RESPONSIVENESS (CRITICAL)

Viewport Behavior:

  • ☐ Fully responsive
  • ☐ Partially responsive
  • ☐ Not responsive

Issues Observed:

  • ☐ Text clipping
  • ☐ Image overflow
  • ☐ Floating/overlapping navigation
  • ☐ Horizontal scroll
  • ☐ Breakpoints missing

Severity:

  • ☐ Low
  • ☐ Medium
  • ☐ High
  • ☐ Critical

Notes:

(1–2 sentences describing the most visible mobile failure.)

---

2. ACCESSIBILITY (WCAG 2.2)

Automated Overlay Detected:

  • ☐ UserWay
  • ☐ AccessiBe
  • ☐ EqualWeb
  • ☐ Other
  • ☐ None

Structural Accessibility Issues:

  • ☐ Missing alt text
  • ☐ Incorrect heading hierarchy
  • ☐ Non semantic div based layout
  • ☐ Keyboard traps
  • ☐ Low contrast text
  • ☐ Non labeled form fields
  • ☐ ARIA misuse
  • ☐ Motion/animation without controls

Severity:

  • ☐ Low
  • ☐ Medium
  • ☐ High
  • ☐ Critical

Notes:

(1–2 sentences describing the most important accessibility gap.)

---

3. PERFORMANCE (INP / LCP / CLS)

Observed Issues:

  • ☐ Slow initial load
  • ☐ High Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
  • ☐ Layout shifts (CLS)
  • ☐ Large unoptimized images
  • ☐ Excessive script payload
  • ☐ Blocking third party scripts
  • ☐ Slow menu interactions

Severity:

  • ☐ Low
  • ☐ Medium
  • ☐ High
  • ☐ Critical

Notes:

(1–2 sentences describing the performance bottleneck.)

---

4. CMS / PLATFORM IDENTIFICATION

Detected Platform:

  • ☐ Custom Java/JVM
  • ☐ Custom PHP
  • ☐ Drupal
  • ☐ ASP.NET
  • ☐ WordPress
  • ☐ Squarespace
  • ☐ Joomla
  • ☐ Wix
  • ☐ jQuery
  • ☐ Bootstrap
  • ☐ AngularJS
  • ☐ React.js
  • ☐ Vue.js

CMS / Platform Condition:

  • ☐ Modern theme
  • ☐ Outdated theme
  • ☐ Deprecated plugins
  • ☐ Security warnings
  • ☐ Hard coded templates
  • ☐ No responsive grid system

Notes:

(1–2 sentences describing the CMS limitations.)

---

5. DESIGN & UX (User Experience)

Issues Observed:

  • ☐ Inconsistent branding
  • ☐ Confusing navigation
  • ☐ Overloaded homepage
  • ☐ Poor content hierarchy
  • ☐ Outdated visual design
  • ☐ Unclear calls to action
  • ☐ Overuse of carousels/sliders
  • ☐ Sensory overload (flashing, clutter)

Severity:

  • ☐ Low
  • ☐ Medium
  • ☐ High

Notes:

(1–2 sentences describing the UX pain point.)

---

6. SEO & STRUCTURE

Issues Observed:

  • ☐ Missing meta descriptions
  • ☐ Missing canonical tags
  • ☐ Duplicate titles
  • ☐ No H1
  • ☐ Broken internal links
  • ☐ No sitemap
  • ☐ No schema/JSON LD
  • ☐ Poor URL structure

Severity:

  • ☐ Low
  • ☐ Medium
  • ☐ High

Notes:

(1–2 sentences describing the SEO gap.)

---

7. SECURITY & MAINTENANCE

Issues Observed:

  • ☐ Outdated CMS version
  • ☐ Outdated plugins
  • ☐ Mixed content warnings
  • ☐ No HTTPS redirect
  • ☐ Exposed admin endpoints
  • ☐ No security headers

Severity:

  • ☐ Low
  • ☐ Medium
  • ☐ High
  • ☐ Critical

Notes:

(1–2 sentences describing the security concern.)

---

8. OVERALL ARCHITECTURAL HEALTH SCORE

Score (0–10):

  • 0–3: Critical — structural rebuild required
  • 4–6: Significant issues — modernization recommended
  • 7–8: Moderate issues — targeted improvements
  • 9–10: Healthy — no major intervention needed

Your Score: _______

---

9. MODERNIZATION RECOMMENDATION

Recommended Path:

  • ☐ Path A — Essential Modernization (Single Chapter)
  • ☐ Path B — Sovereign SEO Architecture (SSA) (Optional Multi-Tenant)

Rationale:

(1–3 sentences summarizing why modernization is needed.)

---
Request Your Audit →
---